|
|
 |
Monty kindly allowed us to publish these
extracts from his speech for the S.P.R. Scole Debate, which took place
on the 11th. December 1999 at Kensington Library, LONDON.
This is the nub of the issue. Some of us - certainly I my self - have
tended to regard as a lamentable waste of time and resources the concentration
on fraud or non fraud, even where that issue is dressed up as "adequate
or inadequate controls?" it comes to the same thing.
I for one felt that the accumulation of evidence was such as to overwhelm
all reasonable doubt. Of course it would not have done had we been invited
to attend a demonstration by Paul Daniels or David Copperfield. We would
have been perfectly well aware of the years of training, accumulation
of skills and the abundance of specialist effects required. But we were
going by invitation into someone's private home to participate in what
six ordinary people obviously believed they were privileged to experience,
and for which they appeared to have been willing to sacrifice a great
deal of their time and energy not to prepare for a public show and rich
rewards, but for the enlightenment and satisfaction of themselves and
a small group of those who had enjoyed a similar experience.
That being so, ought we not now to get on with the more important and
challenging question: from whence do the messages emanate: can we eliminate
the role of the mediums' sub-conscious?
What follows is based on the assumption that we are dealing with something
genuine. The issue is whether that evidence points to discarnate intelligence
or whether we are entitled to go no further than to argue that it may
be attributable only to subliminal activity on the part of human beings.
Do our experiences with the Scole Group take us any further into these
treacherous waters of speculation and deduction: deeper than we have previously
felt justified in venturing from earlier evidence. And how, if at all,
does it differ from earlier evidence?
Although this part of our discussion day is billed as 'mental mediumship",
it must be apparent from the Report that the mental and physical are interlocked.
Those who may in the future have the privilege and opportunity to read
through the verbatim transcripts of some of our sittings will see that,
once a rapport had been established between sitters and communicators,
much of the talk relates to forth-coming, current or recent demonstrations
of physical phenomena, if that term can for this purpose be applied equally
to the performance of lights and accompanying ethereal forms, and to the
breezes and touches, table vibrations, trumpet blasts, drum-beats and
occasional bangs and scratchings, as well as to the more spectacular and
durable physical effects in the form of films.
Likewise much discussion is found to revolve around the production of
the films themselves, the conditions relating to their creation, their
contents and meaning, our efforts to interpret them or under-stand the
occasional clues etc. So we can't isolate the oral messages from the physical.
It became apparent quite early on, and especially when there were references
to Frederic Myers and the founding fathers of the Society (SPR), that
the intention of the communicators - and indeed the whole point of the
exercise - was to provide better evidence of posthumous communication
than had hitherto been obtained. Although what follows must to some extent
be deduction, or inference, it was implicit that the communicators acknowledged
the failure of what must now be accepted as the principal effort to provide
proof of survival in a calculated, organised form rather than through
the sporadic, ad hoc messages from individual mediums to individual sitters
impressive though a good deal of that evidence had proved to be.
This may be familiar meat and drink to old SPR hands, but I don't think
the Scole exercise can be intelligently interpreted except by looking
at the historic background; because this fits in neatly with so much of
what we heard and discussed.
By the beginning of this century, those members of the SPR who had not
already drifted off towards the spiritualists' camp were broadly divided
between those who found the evidence from, in particular but not exclusively,
Mrs Leonore Piper to be clear enough proof that the information she was
transmitting could have come only from beyond the grave; and those who
thought that proposition not proved, since all the communications were
capable of an alternative explanation, one based on the knowledge that
the extra-sensory capacities of the human psyche might well in some exceptional
cases, like Mrs Piper's, be such as to enable her subliminal mind to pick
up information not just from similar recesses of the sitter's mind, but
from those of the minds of unknown third parties.
This belief, later to become known under the generic title of the Super-ES
P hypothesis, was what the authors of the cross-correspondences clearly
set out to falsify. If, from beyond the grave, they could beam intelligible
messages in a form which with no imaginative stretch could be attributable
to a single human intelligence, that should put paid to the Super-ESP.
Unless, that is, one extended it further by postulating an ability on
the part of the medium to dip into the everlasting pool of universal knowledge
stored up in the Akashic records, and by a careful process of selection
pick out the coloured threads which would assemble to form a garment of
radiant hue.
It is well known that the start of these cross-correspondences occurred
at the beginning of this century, shortly after the death of Frederic
Myers. Fragmentary and essentially meaningless messages or words were
transmitted to various mediums usually via automatic writing. They made
sense only when assembled by independent and usually highly intelligent
third parties, as with some complex verbal jigsaw puzzles. Later generations
of psychical researchers, dedicated to laboratory-type, statistically
based experiments of the sort that attracts official funding and sometimes
even demonstrates a marginally discernible anomaly, have tended to lose
sight of this formidable array of evidence. Or else they will dismiss
it, as several eminent SPR leaders have done, as so replete with ambiguity
and complexity, and demanding of familiarity with classical literature
or poetic allusion, as to try the patience of the most dedicated scholar.
Be that as it may, the fad is that these efforts at communication effectively
ended over 60 years ago. Great volumes of scripts and learned analyses
gather dust today. Those in the celestial realm who appear to have been
at such prolonged pains to show that they are still around seem until
now to have confined themselves to soliloquies through mediums attended
by such authors as Sir Oliver Lodge, Maurice BarbanelL Geraldine Cummins
and Paul Beard.
If, as we have reason to suspect, the Scole experience was an effort
to present fresh evidence which would be simpler, more direct, and more
tangible than even the most ingeniously impressive of the cross-correspondences,
then it was far from being a failure. We need not be too fussed about
the apparent meaningless of the lights, touches, noises and so on: they
could reasonably be regarded as a necessary means to convince sitters
to take the communications seriously, and to show they were not the victims
of human deception. And the jokes and puns and laughter? Well, they might
reasonably be regarded as means both to encourage the right attitude of
warmth and participation which, for all we know, may be an important ingredient
in the mix of energies required for the production of phenomena; or they
may simply indicate that the next world is not all fear and gloom as we
prepare for judgement day and accustom ourselves to the sound of dragging
chains and wailing voices.
It is easy to overlook the fact that these sittings differed fundamentally
from the normal sittings with mediums, where the sitter is there primarily
either to contact some deceased person or, no less frequently, for advice
and guidance on matters troubling them. Although from time to time one
or other of us might ask after a particular person, a missing colleague
or a former professional associate, for example, this was not the object
of our visit; nor did it appear to be the purpose or intention of the
communicators. Nevertheless it is noteworthy that Emily, the chief communicator,
speaking through Diana as ever, and with an almost entirely new audience
gathered in a room several thousand miles from home territory, suddenly
identified and described a recently dead young man, his driving accident,
his blue-coloured car, his occasional pot-smoking and his habit of doodling.
Another spirit visitor for whom eight correct identifying features or
relationships were provided immediately followed this. However, these
seemed to be no more than occasional' and apparently spontaneous, examples
of odd appearances in Emily's presence. There did not seem to be anything
premeditated or orderly about them.
They came into the same category as many of the seemingly throwaway remarks
by Emily Bradshaw, who appears to have carried on into the next world
her earthly role as a society hostess as various deceased members of the
SPR's turn of the century notabilities dropped in for a drink or a capdoffing.
But it is when we come to examples like the Ruth films that the subliminal
notion begins to come apart at the seams. It presupposes that both the
mediums, because both contributed to the several discussions we had about
these two films - had carefully studied the introductory explanation and
the reproductions of Dorothy Wordsworth's hand-written amendments to the
poem Ruth, having fortuitously come across a copy of the catalogue of
a Christies miscellaneous book sale 30 years earlier, and then forgotten
all about it: forgotten that either of them had ever seen it. And yet
the conversations we record in Chapter VII show very clearly that, whoever
is communicating had a pretty good idea of the origin and history of the
amendments which form the subject of the Ruth puzzle. We can ascribe a
great deal to the subliminal mind, but hardly something as memorable as
this feat.
But before probing further into the sort of messages which were conveyed
during our sittings with the Scole Group, and whether they were all platitude
and generalisation, let us look more closely at the alternative posed
in the title of this session.
Does the evidence fit the hypothesis of subliminal origin, no matter whether
it emerges from the mind of the medium or from the Group, or the Group
plus the collective investigators, or from the whole lot of them plus
humanity in general. Is there a necessary extraneous element1 something
which could not possibly have originated from humankind?
I think the answer which I would give, and I believe this represents
the considered view of my colleagues too, is that there is nothing which
absolutely proves anything, certainly not survival. But there is a great
deal which places what many will consider almost intolerable strains on
any form of purely terrestrial interpretation, which I believe to be the
only viable alternative to survival.
We must also accept that there is respectable evidence that the human
mind can project thought-images onto plates of films. If admittedly exceptional
human beings can somehow imprint thought-images on films, could we not
push it one stage further by suggesting that this is precisely what happened
at Scole?
Well we could, but it would have to be an exceptionally vigorous push.
Previous thought-images have gone straight on to flat plates: admittedly
one of a stack of plates in Mita's case, but still flat. At Scole we have
the phenomenon of a thought-image getting on to a rolled-up film almost
invariably in its plastic container, and usually concealed either in a
plastic security bag or in a locked box or held in an investigator's hands.
That's one difference. The second, and more significant one from our viewpoint,
is that the earlier examples were all of images of existing scenes projected
onto a sensitised plate, as determined by an experimenter or chosen by
a psychic. At Scole we had a disparate range of objects which it would
be difficult indeed to attribute to the psyche of one of the mediums,
or, less still, to the collective thought-wishes of a Group.
We had actually invited the spirit Team to produce a film of something
we would think of there and then. But they made it clear that their aim
was to get their thoughts, not ours, nor those of the Group, on to films.
They had a point. The question is whether the films, taken as a whole,
can be regarded as unlikely at the least, or impossible at the best, to
have emerged from the human mind.
Well, look at the pictures and judge for yourselves. There can be no definitive
conclusion. One can reasonably contend, however, that if these are all
from the Group's subconscious, or in the video version from subliminal
gropings into the Akashic records, then we have a fresh and formidable
new assemblage of attributes to pile on to our subliminal minds, not helped
by the absence of any positive evidence. Here we have a number of pictures
about which the Group - and we are now assuming honesty on their part
- share our bewilderment, and sometimes our excitement.
It was members of the Group themselves who eagerly rushed to inform us
of how and where they had traced the origin of one of the hermetic references,
the Perfectio film seen in Plate S in the Proceedings, and more clearly
explained in the Exhibition outside. Likewise I was roused around midnight
after Diana had found the Ruth poem of Wordsworth, which was the subject
of so much subsequent research and speculation.
If we have reached the stage of accepting that all was not invention
and deception, then we have no alternative than to conclude that it is
pushing improbability beyond reasonable limits to argue that something
as obscure and emotionally charged as was the Ruth amendment, was likely
to have originated from the subliminal minds of any or all of the Scole
Group.
Then take the Schnittger poem. No one has yet found who wrote it and where
it comes from. It's regarded as pretty good German, and fairly characteristic
of the language and style extant about a century and a half ago, although
the handwriting is more modem. What extravagant assumptions must we make
to attribute this, too, to the Group psyche!
The plain truth is that any theory of subliminal activity, no matter how
extensive one assumes the field of that activity to be, simply does not
square with the fact that careful research and artistic preparation are
required for physical effects like apports or, more relevantly, film strips.
It is a theory based entirely on mental evidence, not physical.
Let us grant that the phenomenon of psychokinesis has been established.
[I note that a paper published in our Journal as long ago as 1945 by our
present President considered the case to have already been made out, on
statistical grounds, although he and most others have been discussing
very marginal movements apparently controlled by the mind operating at
a distance.] But since there's also plenty of evidence that quite massive
movements can occur, especially and notoriously in poltergeist cases where
heavy pieces of furniture can be moved around, and household articles
can be made to disappear and re-appear in different places, then it is
possible to argue that the psyche can exercise this powerful force. But
one cannot therefore conclude that the force is in no way sponsored or
organised by some form of non-human agency.
There is ample evidence to show that it is. What sort of purely psychic
influence is it that can not only illuminate then dematerialise and then
rematerialise crystals, but also dematerialise rolls of virgin film inside
plastic tubs, work on them and return them to their capped tubs to await
processing.
A few weeks ago in this hall, when we were considering the question of
what constitutes evidence of the paranormal acceptable to the scientific
mind, I broadly endorsed the dictum of David Hume, that only if the alternative
explanation was less plausible than the apparent miracle it purported
to explain would he accept the miraculous.
If you put the messages and manipulations of discarnate entities in the
category of miracles, and then consider the alternative explanations I
have explored, you can perhaps see why I am somewhat reluctantly and cagily,
on the side of the miraculous.
|
|
 |